EnglishDeutsch/api/energyGitHub · iceccarelli
Grimaldi EngineeringCluster-Steuerung · Frankfurt
Energy Intelligence · Cluster 1

Forschungsfront

Forschung überlebt nur, wenn sie ein Produkt verbessert, verteidigbare IP schafft oder glaubwürdige wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse liefert. Nichts heißt „State of the Art“ ohne veröffentlichten Benchmark gegen eine klassische Baseline.

Ein Benchmark-Eintrag enthält

datasetbaselinemetricconfidence intervalhardwarelatencyfailure casesgeneralizationablation

Evidenzmatrix — Benchmark-Felder je Themaberichtetfehlt
datasetbaselinemetricresultCIhardwarelatencyfailuresreproPINNs for AC/DC power flowPINNs for AC/DC power flow · dataset: IEEE 9-busPINNs for AC/DC power flow · baseline: Newton-Raphson (pandapower)PINNs for AC/DC power flow · metric: Voltage-angle RMSEPINNs for AC/DC power flow · result: DC 0.0124° · AC 0.0035° (owner-stated)PINNs for AC/DC power flow · CI: not reportedPINNs for AC/DC power flow · hardware: not reportedPINNs for AC/DC power flow · latency: not reportedPINNs for AC/DC power flow · failures: not reportedPINNs for AC/DC power flow · repro: falseMILP dispatch vs learned dispatchMILP dispatch vs learned dispatch · dataset: no benchmarkMILP dispatch vs learned dispatch · baseline: no benchmarkMILP dispatch vs learned dispatch · metric: no benchmarkMILP dispatch vs learned dispatch · result: no benchmarkMILP dispatch vs learned dispatch · CI: no benchmarkMILP dispatch vs learned dispatch · hardware: no benchmarkMILP dispatch vs learned dispatch · latency: no benchmarkMILP dispatch vs learned dispatch · failures: no benchmarkMILP dispatch vs learned dispatch · repro: no benchmarkProbabilistic forecasting (load, PV, price)Probabilistic forecasting (load, PV, price) · dataset: no benchmarkProbabilistic forecasting (load, PV, price) · baseline: no benchmarkProbabilistic forecasting (load, PV, price) · metric: no benchmarkProbabilistic forecasting (load, PV, price) · result: no benchmarkProbabilistic forecasting (load, PV, price) · CI: no benchmarkProbabilistic forecasting (load, PV, price) · hardware: no benchmarkProbabilistic forecasting (load, PV, price) · latency: no benchmarkProbabilistic forecasting (load, PV, price) · failures: no benchmarkProbabilistic forecasting (load, PV, price) · repro: no benchmarkInertia / RoCoF with grid-forming invertersInertia / RoCoF with grid-forming inverters · dataset: Book appendix figures (chapter 1)Inertia / RoCoF with grid-forming inverters · baseline: Swing equationInertia / RoCoF with grid-forming inverters · metric: Test pass against stated figuresInertia / RoCoF with grid-forming inverters · result: 48 tests passInertia / RoCoF with grid-forming inverters · CI: n/aInertia / RoCoF with grid-forming inverters · hardware: n/aInertia / RoCoF with grid-forming inverters · latency: n/aInertia / RoCoF with grid-forming inverters · failures: n/aInertia / RoCoF with grid-forming inverters · repro: trueSafe / constrained RL for dispatchSafe / constrained RL for dispatch · dataset: no benchmarkSafe / constrained RL for dispatch · baseline: no benchmarkSafe / constrained RL for dispatch · metric: no benchmarkSafe / constrained RL for dispatch · result: no benchmarkSafe / constrained RL for dispatch · CI: no benchmarkSafe / constrained RL for dispatch · hardware: no benchmarkSafe / constrained RL for dispatch · latency: no benchmarkSafe / constrained RL for dispatch · failures: no benchmarkSafe / constrained RL for dispatch · repro: no benchmarkGNNs / neural operators for grid stateGNNs / neural operators for grid state · dataset: no benchmarkGNNs / neural operators for grid state · baseline: no benchmarkGNNs / neural operators for grid state · metric: no benchmarkGNNs / neural operators for grid state · result: no benchmarkGNNs / neural operators for grid state · CI: no benchmarkGNNs / neural operators for grid state · hardware: no benchmarkGNNs / neural operators for grid state · latency: no benchmarkGNNs / neural operators for grid state · failures: no benchmarkGNNs / neural operators for grid state · repro: no benchmarkRuntime assurance & agent verificationRuntime assurance & agent verification · dataset: no benchmarkRuntime assurance & agent verification · baseline: no benchmarkRuntime assurance & agent verification · metric: no benchmarkRuntime assurance & agent verification · result: no benchmarkRuntime assurance & agent verification · CI: no benchmarkRuntime assurance & agent verification · hardware: no benchmarkRuntime assurance & agent verification · latency: no benchmarkRuntime assurance & agent verification · failures: no benchmarkRuntime assurance & agent verification · repro: no benchmarkUncertainty quantification & distribution s…Uncertainty quantification & distribution shift · dataset: no benchmarkUncertainty quantification & distribution shift · baseline: no benchmarkUncertainty quantification & distribution shift · metric: no benchmarkUncertainty quantification & distribution shift · result: no benchmarkUncertainty quantification & distribution shift · CI: no benchmarkUncertainty quantification & distribution shift · hardware: no benchmarkUncertainty quantification & distribution shift · latency: no benchmarkUncertainty quantification & distribution shift · failures: no benchmarkUncertainty quantification & distribution shift · repro: no benchmark

Eine volle Zeile ist die Bedingung für das Wort „State of the Art“. Heute ist keine Zeile voll.

Themen

ThemaProduktnutzenModulRepositoryZustandNächster Schritt
PINNs for AC/DC power flowSurrogate power flow for fast candidate screeningphysicsphysics-informedpartialPublish the full record with CI, latency vs Newton, and behaviour on 39-bus / 118-bus (generalization).
MILP dispatch vs learned dispatchWedge A — BESS / community dispatchoptimizeGridOSunbenchmarkedBenchmark MILP against the customer's rule-based schedule on real prices; learned policies only after MILP is deployed.
Probabilistic forecasting (load, PV, price)Forecast inputs to dispatch; forecast-error KPIforecastGridOS (MPC loop)unbenchmarkedPersistence and seasonal-naive baselines first; pinball loss on open data (e.g. ENTSO-E Transparency, Open Power System Data).
Inertia / RoCoF with grid-forming invertersPhysics constraint checks; credibilityphysicsRenewables_Migration_*_Proof_EnginepartialSeparate book-consistency tests from physical validation against a public dynamics case.
Safe / constrained RL for dispatchNot before MILP is in productionoptimize—watchWatch only. Revisit when there is customer data and a deployed baseline.
GNNs / neural operators for grid stateState estimation with sparse measurementstwin—watchWatch only.
Runtime assurance & agent verificationNeuralBridge designneuralbridgeNeuralBridge (unlocated) · mcp-foundryunbenchmarkedSpecify the simplex-architecture style monitor; formalize the envelope check; property tests before any code.
Uncertainty quantification & distribution shiftForecast intervals; refusal to act under shiftforecast · planning—watchConformal intervals on the forecasting module once it has a backtest.
Benchmark-Eintrag: PINNs for AC/DC power flow
DatensatzBaselineMetrikErgebnisKIHardwareLatenzFehlerfällereproduzierbar
IEEE 9-busNewton-Raphson (pandapower)Voltage-angle RMSEDC 0.0124° · AC 0.0035° (owner-stated)not reportednot reportednot reportednot reportedfalse
Benchmark-Eintrag: Inertia / RoCoF with grid-forming inverters
DatensatzBaselineMetrikErgebnisKIHardwareLatenzFehlerfällereproduzierbar
Book appendix figures (chapter 1)Swing equationTest pass against stated figures48 tests passn/an/an/an/atrue

Beobachtete Front

OPFAC/DC power flowMPCGNNsneural operatorsPINNsdifferentiable simulationsafe RLconstrained RLuncertainty quantificationdistribution shiftcausal inferenceprobabilistic forecastingdigital twinsmulti-agent optimizationformal methodsruntime assuranceagent verification

Stand 2026-09-05Maschinenlesbar: /api/energy/researchAlle Ressourcen: /api/energy/index

Verfasst und gepflegt von Vincenzo Ceccarelli Grimaldi, Frankfurt am Main.